Determining Evaluation Criteria And Sub-Criteria For E-Learning Software

Authors

  • Ahmad Fadli Saad Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Rukaini Abdullah Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Liyana Shuib Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22452/mjcs.vol30no3.4

Keywords:

e-Learning Software, Evaluation Criteria and Sub-criteria, e-Learning Software Evaluation, Commercial off the Shelf Software

Abstract

Today’s demands for e-learning have led to the emergence of numerous and diverse e-Learning software (e-LS) products in the market. With such a myriad of choices, selecting an e-LS can be difficult. In any software evaluation process, evaluation criteria are important for correct selection to be made. However, in the case of e-LS selection, information about its evaluation criteria is lacking. Hence, a Delphi study was conducted to identify the evaluation criteria for e-LS. This paper presents the study and its results. Eleven criteria and sixty six 66 sub-criteria were identified from the literature. A questionnaire comprising the criteria as items was distributed to 31 experts in the first round. 16 sub-criteria were added by the experts. After two Delphi rounds, three criteria were considered as being extremely important and eight criteria as important. One sub-criteria was rejected as it did not achieve the majority of expert consensus. In total, 11 criteria and 81 sub-criteria were obtained from this study. The results of this study indicate that these criteria and sub-criteria are important in the evaluation of e-LS.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-09-23

How to Cite

Saad, A. F., Abdullah, R., & Shuib, L. (2017). Determining Evaluation Criteria And Sub-Criteria For E-Learning Software. Malaysian Journal of Computer Science, 30(3), 219–241. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjcs.vol30no3.4

Most read articles by the same author(s)