Dynamic interactions of research, publication, researchers, institutions, and countries: A Quintuple Helix model perspective on research impact
Main Article Content
Abstract
This review paper introduces and explores the Research Impact Quintuple Helix Model, a comprehensive framework designed to analyse and enhance the impact of research across societal, economic, and environmental dimensions. Unlike traditional models focusing on sectoral collaboration for innovation and economic development, this model integrates five critical elements - Research, Publication, Researchers, Institutions, and Countries - offering a holistic approach to understanding research impact. The study systematically examines the dynamic interactions among these elements, emphasising their collective role in fostering collaborative synergies, interdisciplinary research, and effective resource allocation. By aligning research activities with broader societal needs and environmental considerations, the model aims to extend the scope of research impact beyond academic achievements, highlighting the importance of policy alignment, societal engagement, and sustainable practices. Key comparisons with the standard Helix models demonstrate the unique contributions of the research impact quintuple helix model, illustrating its potential to address specific challenges in maximising research benefits. The paper identifies strategic collaborations and policy implications that could significantly enhance the societal benefits of research, advocating for a structured integration of the model’s elements into research and policy-making processes. The review concludes by recognising limitations in the existing literature and calling for empirical studies to validate and refine the model. Future research should incorporate quantitative methods to measure the impact effectively, aiming to transform theoretical insights into actionable strategies for a sustainable and impactful research ecosystem.
Downloads
Article Details
It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to the journal have not been published, accepted for publication, nor simultaneously submitted for publication elsewhere. By submitting a manuscript, the author(s) agree that copyright for the article is transferred to the publisher, if and when the manuscript is accepted for publication.
References
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2022). The effect of academic mobility on research performance: The case of Italy. Quantitative Science Studies, 3(2), 345-362.
Acharya, K. P., & Pathak, S. (2019). Applied research in low-income countries: why and how? Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 4, 3.
Adam, J. (2023). The importance of effective time management in research: Strategies for improving productivity. Research Methodology and Techniques. https://researchleap.com/the-importance-of-effective-time-management-in-research-strategies-for-improving-productivity/.
Aiyede, E. R. (2023). From Research to Policy Action: Communicating Research for Public Policy Making. In E. R. Aiyede & B. Muganda (Eds.), Public Policy and Research in Africa (pp. 251-266). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99724-3.
Alexander, P. A., Kulikowich, J. M., & Schulze, S. K. (1994). The influence of topic knowledge, domain knowledge, and interest on the comprehension of scientific exposition. Learning and Individual Differences, 6(4), 379-397.
Alfonso, F., & Crea, F. (2023). Preprints: a game changer in scientific publications? European Heart Journal, 44(3), 171-173. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac665.
Ali, J., & Ali, T. (2023). Circular economy and agriculture: mapping scientific productivity, research pattern and future research direction. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-46.
Allareddy, V., Allareddy, V., Rampa, S., Nalliah, R. P., & Elangovan, S. (2015). Global dental research productivity and its association with human development, gross national income, and political stability. Journal of Evidence Based Dental Practice, 15(3), 90-96.
Amara, N., Landry, R., & Halilem, N. (2015). What can university administrators do to increase the publication and citation scores of their faculty members? Scientometrics, 103, 489-530.
Anderson, P. S., Odom, A. R., Gray, H. M., Jones, J. B., Christensen, W. F., Hollingshead, T., Hadfield, J. G., Evans-Pickett, A., Frost, M., & Wilson, C. (2020). A case study exploring associations between popular media attention of scientific research and scientific citations. PLoS ONE, 15(7), e0234912.
Arora, A., Mittal, A., & Pasari, R. (2011). What makes a good researcher. Social and Information Network Analysis.
Askeland, H. (2020). Institutional leadership: Maintaining and developing the ‘good’ organisation. In H. Askeland, G. Espedal, B. Jelstad Løvaas, & S. Sirris (Eds.), Understanding values work: Institutional perspectives in organizations and leadership (pp. 139-158). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37748-9_8
Audretsch, D. B., Bozeman, B., Combs, K. L., Feldman, M., Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., Stephan, P., Tassey, G., & Wessner, C. (2002). The economics of science and technology. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27, 155-203.
Bammer, G. (2013). Disciplining interdisciplinarity: Integration and implementation sciences for researching complex real-world problems. ANU Press.
Beck, S., Bergenholtz, C., Bogers, M., Brasseur, T.-M., Conradsen, M. L., Di Marco, D., Distel, A. P., Dobusch, L., Dörler, D., & Effert, A. (2022). The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach. Industry and Innovation, 29(2), 136-185.
Becker, B. (2015). Public R&D policies and private R&D investment: A survey of the empirical evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(5), 917-942.
Belavy, D. L., Owen, P. J., & Livingston, P. M. (2020). Do successful PhD outcomes reflect the research environment rather than academic ability? PLoS ONE, 15(8), e0236327.
Bentley, P. (2012). Gender differences and factors affecting publication productivity among Australian university academics. Journal of Sociology, 48(1), 85-103.
Bentley, P. J., Gulbrandsen, M., & Kyvik, S. (2015). The relationship between basic and applied research in universities. Higher Education, 70, 689-709.
Berg, J. M., Bhalla, N., Bourne, P. E., Chalfie, M., Drubin, D. G., Fraser, J. S., Greider, C. W., Hendricks, M., Jones, C., & Kiley, R., ….., & Wolberger, C. (2016). Preprints for the life sciences: The time is right for biologists to post their research findings onto pre-print servers. Science, 352(6288), 899-901.
Bieschke, K. J., Bishop, R. M., & Garcia, V. L. (1996). The utility of the research self-efficacy scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 4(1), 59-75.
Björk, B.-C., & Solomon, D. (2012). Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact. BMC Medicine, 10(1), 1-10.
Bolick, J., Emmett, A., Greenberg, M. L., Rosenblum, B., & Peterson, A. T. (2017). How open access is crucial to the future of science. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 81(4), 564-566.
Bonaccorso, E., Bozhankova, R., Cadena, C. D., Čapská, V., Czerniewicz, L., Emmett, A., Oludayo, F. F., Glukhova, N., Greenberg, M. L., Hladnik, M., Grillet, M. E., Indrawan, M., Kapović, M., Kleiner, Y., Łaziński, M., Loyola, R. D., Menon, S., Morales, L. G., Ocampo, C., Pérez-Emán, J., Peterson, A. T., Poposki, D., Rasheed, A. A., Rodríguez-Clark, K. M., Rodríguez, J. P., Rosenblum, B., Sánchez-Cordero, V., Smolík, F., Snoj, M., Szilágyi, I., Torres, O., & Tykarski, P. (2014). Bottlenecks in the open-access system: Voices from around the globe. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 2(2), eP1126.
Bornmann, L., & Marx, W. (2013). How good is research really? Measuring the citation impact of publications with percentiles increases correct assessments and fair comparisons. EMBO Reports, 14(3), 226-230.
Boukacem-Zeghmouri, C., Bador, P., Lafouge, T., & Prost, H. (2016). Relationships between consumption, publication and impact in French universities in a value perspective: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 106, 263-280.
Boyd, C. J., Bekisz, J. M., Salibian, A. A., Karp, N. S., & Choi, M. (2022). Research promotion is associated with broader influence and higher impact of plastic surgery publications. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 150(2), 466-472.
Bromley, E., Mikesell, L., Jones, F., & Khodyakov, D. (2015). From subject to participant: Ethics and the evolving role of community in health research. AmericanJournal of Public Health, 105(5), 900-908.
Brown, A. N. (2017, April 18). Why should practitioners publish their research in journals? R&E Search for Evidence, an FHI 360 Blog. https://researchforevidence.fhi360.org/ practitioners-publish-research-journals.
Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1391-1412.
Calvert, J. (2006). What’s special about basic research? Science, Technology, & Human Values, 31(2), 199-220.
Cambon-Thomsen, A., Thorisson, G. A., Mabile, L., Andrieu, S., Bertier, G., Boeckhout, M., Carpenter, J., Dagher, G., Dalgleish, R., Deschênes, M., Di Donato, J. H., Filocamo, M., Goldberg, M., Hewitt, R., Hofman, P., Kauffmann, F., Leitsalu, L., Lomba, I., Melegh, B., . . . Zins, M., & Mabile, L. (the BRIF workshop group) (2011). The role of a bioresource research impact factor as an incentive to share human bioresources. Nature Genetics, 43(6), 503 – 504. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.831.
Campbell, D., Struck, B., Tippett, C., & Roberge, G. (2017). Impact of multidisciplinary research on innovation. Science-Metrix, ISSI 2017, paper 153. https://science-metrix.com/fr/impact-of-multidisciplinary-research-on-innovation/
Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1, 1-12.
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2010). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other?: a proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development (IJSESD), 1(1), 41-69.
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3/4), 201. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374.
Carbon, C.-C. (2011). The carbon_h-factor: Predicting individuals' research impact at early stages of their career. PLoS ONE, 6(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028770 .
Choi, B. C. K., & Pak, A. W. P. (2006). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clinical and Investigative Medicine, 29(6), 351-364.
Cole, S., & Cole, J. R. (1967). Scientific output and recognition: A study in the operation of the reward system in science. American Sociological Review, 32(3), 377-390.
Colombo, A. (2019). Why do local institutions matter? The political economy of decentralisation. Reflets et Perspectives de la vie Economique, LIX, 2020(1), 115-130. https://shs.cairn.info/journal-reflets-et-perspectives-de-la-vie-economique-2020-1-page-115?lang=en&tab=texte-integral
Costas, R., Van Leeuwen, T. N., & Bordons, M. (2010). A bibliometric classificatory approach for the study and assessment of research performance at the individual level: The effects of age on productivity and impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(8), 1564-1581.
Dalziel, M., Rowsell, J., Tahmina, T., & Zhao, X. (2012). Impact of government investments in research and innovation: A review of academic investigations. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2166091. 10.2139/ssrn.2166091.
Dawadi, S., Shrestha, S., & Giri, R. A. (2021). Mixed-methods research: A discussion on its types, challenges, and criticisms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 2(2), 25-36.
Dela Vega, M. P. D., Yu, J. R. T., Espiritu, A. I., & Jamora, R. D. G. (2021). Primary headache research output and association with socioeconomic factors in Southeast Asia: a bibliometric analysis. Neurological Sciences, 42, 2683-2693.
Dhillon, S. K., Ibrahim, R., & Selamat, A. (2015). Factors associated with scholarly publication productivity among academic staff: Case of a Malaysian public university. Technology in Society, 42, 160-166.
Diamond, A. (1984). An economic model of the life-cycle research productivity of scientists. Scientometrics, 6(3), 189-196.
Doh, S., Jang, D., Kang, G. M., & Han, D. S. (2018). Research funding and performance of academic researchers in South Korea. Review of Policy Research, 35(1), 31-60.
Doran, K., Gelber, A., & Isen, A. (2022). The effects of high-skilled immigration policy on firms: Evidence from visa lotteries. Journal of Political Economy, 130(10), 2501-2533.
DuMez, E. (2000). The role and activities of scientific societies in promoting research integrity. (A report of a conference, April 10, 2000, Washington, DC). American Association for the Advancement of Science, U.S. Office of Research Integrity. https://ori.hhs.gov/documents/role_scientific_societies.pdf.
Dusdal, J., & Powell, J. J. (2021). Benefits, motivations, and challenges of international collaborative research: a sociology of science case study. Science and Public Policy, 48(2), 235-245.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123.
Falagas, M. E., Kouranos, V. D., Arencibia-Jorge, R., & Karageorgopoulos, D. E. (2008). Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor. The FASEB Journal, 22(8), 2623-2628.
Fecher, B., & Hebing, M. (2021). How do researchers approach societal impact? PLoS ONE, 16(7), e0254006.
Flynn, C., & Rose, C. (2020). Designing research impact for social inclusion: A practical guide. Handbook of Social Inclusion: Research and Practices in Health and Social Sciences, 1-25.
Foster, C., Wager, E., Marchington, J., Patel, M., Banner, S., Kennard, N. C., Panayi, A., Stacey, R., & Group, G. W. (2019). Good practice for conference abstracts and presentations: GPCAP. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 4(1), 11.
Fournier-Viger, P. (2016, June 21). Six important skills to become a successful researcher. The Data Blog. https://data-mining.philippe-fournier-viger.com/how-to-become-a-good-researcher/.
Fukuzawa, N. (2014). An empirical analysis of the relationship between individual characteristics and research productivity. Scientometrics, 99(3), 785-809.
García-Rodríguez, A., Barrio, R. A., Govezensky, T., Parga, T., Pérez, M. R., Calvet, H. C., Jiménez Andrade, J. L., Arencibia-Jorge, R., & Kaski, K. (2023). Impact of institutional organization on research productivity and multidisciplinarity. Frontiers in Physics, 11, 1161019.
Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA, 295(1), 90-93.
Gasparyan, A. Y., Yessirkepov, M., Duisenova, A., Trukhachev, V. I., Kostyukova, E. I., & Kitas, G. D. (2018). Researcher and author impact metrics: variety, value, and context. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 33(18).
George, E. (2023, January 16). Top 10 qualities and characteristics of a good researcher. Researcher Life. https://researcher.life/blog/article/becoming-a-good-researcher-10-must-have-characteristics-for-success/ .
Gisbert, J. P., & Chaparro, M. (2020). Tips and guidelines for being a successful researcher. Gastroenterología y Hepatología (English Edition), 43(9), 540-550.
Glennon, B. (2023). How do restrictions on high-skilled immigration affect offshoring? Evidence from the H-1B program. Management Science, 70(2), 907-930.
Godin, B. (2006). The linear model of innovation: The historical construction of an analytical framework. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 31(6), 639-667.
Gonzalez-Brambila, C., & Veloso, F. M. (2007). The determinants of research output and impact: A study of Mexican researchers. Research Policy, 36(7), 1035-1051.
González-Martinez, P., García-Pérez-De-Lema, D., Castillo-Vergara, M., & Hansen, P. B. (2023). Determinants and performance of the quadruple helix model and the mediating role of civil society. Technology in Society, 75, 102358.
Gorodnichenko, Y., Pham, T., & Talavera, O. (2021). Conference presentations and academic publishing. Economic Modelling, 95, 228-254.
Grant, J. (2021). Academic incentives and research impact: Developing reward and recognition systems to better people’s lives. AcademyHealth, February 2021.
Grilli, L., & Murtinu, S. (2014). Government, venture capital and the growth of European high-tech entrepreneurial firms. Research Policy, 43(9), 1523-1543.
Guellec, D., & Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie, B. (2003). The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(3), 225-243.
Halevi, G., Moed, H. F., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2016). Researchers’ mobility, productivity and impact: Case of top producing authors in seven disciplines. Publishing Research Quarterly, 32, 22-37.
Hall, B. H. (2002). The financing of research and development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1), 35-51.
Hall, B. H. (2005). The financing of innovation. The Handbook of Technology and Innovation Management, 409-430.
Hall, B. H., & Lerner, J. (2010). Chapter 14 - The financing of R&D and innovation. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, 1, 609-639.
Hall, B. H., & Oriani, R. (2006). Does the market value R&D investment by European firms? Evidence from a panel of manufacturing firms in France, Germany, and Italy. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24(5), 971-993.
Hamid, R. S., Anwar, S. M., Salju, Rahmawati, Hastuti, & Lumoindong, Y. (2019). Using the triple helix model to determine the creativity a capabilities of innovative environment. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 343(1), 012144. 10.1088/1755-1315/343/1/012144 .
Hammersley, M. (2009). Against the ethicists: on the evils of ethical regulation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(3), 211-225.
Hartwich, F., & Springer-Heinze, A. (2003). Enhancing the Impact of Agricultural Research: An Impact Pathway Perspective. International Service for National Agricultural Research (ISNAR), ISNAR Briefing Paper 66. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/136261.
Hendrix, S. (2024, March 18). How to become an expert in your scientific field. Smart Science Career. https://smartsciencecareer.com/expert-in-your-scientific-field/.
Hicks, D. J. (2021). Productivity and interdisciplinary impacts of Organized Research Units. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(3), 990-1022.
Hoffmann, K., Berg, S., & Koufogiannakis, D. (2017). Understanding factors that encourage research productivity in academic librarians. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 12(4), 102.
Horta, H., Cattaneo, M., & Meoli, M. (2018). PhD funding as a determinant of PhD and career research performance. Studies in Higher Education, 43(3), 542-570.
Horta, H., Dautel, V., & Veloso, F. M. (2012). An output perspective on the teaching–research nexus: an analysis focusing on the United States higher education system. Studies in Higher Education, 37(2), 171-187.
Howard, H. C., Mascalzoni, D., Mabile, L., Houeland, G., Rial-Sebbag, E., & Cambon-Thomsen, A. (2018). How to responsibly acknowledge research work in the era of big data and biobanks: ethical aspects of the Bioresource Research Impact Factor (BRIF). Journal of Community Genetics, 9(2), 169 – 176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-017-0332-6.
Huq, F. A., Pawar, K. S., & Rogers, H. (2015). Research impact of disturbance factors on supply chain configuration strategy: Insights from the pharmaceutical industry. The 23rd International Conference for Production Research (ICPR).
Huutoniemi, K., Klein, J. T., Bruun, H., & Hukkinen, J. (2010). Analyzing interdisciplinarity: Typology and indicators. Research Policy, 39(1), 79-88.
Ibegbulam, I. J., & Jacintha, E. U. (2016). Factors that contribute to research and publication output among librarians in Nigerian university libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(1), 15-20.
Iqbal, M. Z., & Mahmood, A. (2011). Factors related to low research productivity at higher education level. Asian Social Science, 7(2), 188.
Jacob, B. A., & Lefgren, L. (2011). The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity. Journal of PublicEconomics, 95(9-10), 1168-1177.
Jaffe, A. B., & De Rassenfosse, G. (2017). Patent citation data in social science research: Overview and best practices. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(6), 1360-1374.
Jensen, M. (2015). Personality traits, learning and academic achievements. Journal of Education and Learning, 4(4), 91-118.
Jeong, S., Choi, J. Y., & Kim, J. (2011). The determinants of research collaboration modes: Exploring the effects of research and researcher characteristics on co-authorship. Scientometrics, 89(3), 967-983.
Ju, M. (2010). The impact of institutional and peer support on faculty research productivity: A comparative analysis of research vs. non-research institutions [Doctoral dissertation, Seton Hall University]. Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses (ETDs). 1608. https://scholarship.shu.edu/dissertations/1608
Kalev, A., & Dobbin, F. (2022, September-October). The surprising benefits of work/life support. Harvard Business Review Magazine. https://hbr.org/2022/09/the-surprising-benefits-of-work-life-support
Kanger, L., Sovacool, B. K., & Noorkõiv, M. (2020). Six policy intervention points for sustainability transitions: A conceptual framework and a systematic literature review. Research Policy, 49(7), 104072.
Karakose, T., & Demirkol, M. (2021). Exploring the emerging COVID-19 research trends and current status in the field of education: A bibliometric analysis and knowledge mapping. Educational Process International Journal, 10(2), 7-27. 10.22521/edupij.2021.102.1
Karki, M. (1997). Patent citation analysis: A policy analysis tool. World Patent Information, 19(4), 269-272.
Kim, J. (2011). Political institutions and public R&D expenditures in democratic countries. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(13), 843-857.
King, G., Servais, M., Forchuk, C., Chalmers, H., Currie, M., Law, M., Specht, J., Rosenbaum, P., Willoughby, T., & Kertoy, M. (2010). Features and impacts of five multidisciplinary community–university research partnerships. Health & Social Care in the Community, 18(1), 59-69.
Kinney, A. (2007). National scientific facilities and their science impact on nonbiomedical research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(46), 17943-17947.
Kyvik, S., & Aksnes, D. W. (2015). Explaining the increase in publication productivity among academic staff: A generational perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 40(8), 1438-1453.
Kyvik, S., & Reymert, I. (2017). Research collaboration in groups and networks: differences across academic fields. Scientometrics, 113, 951-967.
Lauder, H. (2014, November 11). Research impact: how academics can grab policy makers’ attention. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/2014/nov/11/academics-grab-policy-makers-attention.
Laurance, W. F., Useche, D. C., Laurance, S. G., & Bradshaw, C. J. (2013). Predicting publication success for biologists. BioScience, 63(10), 817-823.
Lee, D. H. (2019). Predictive power of conference-related factors on citation rates of conference papers. Scientometrics, 118(1), 281-304.
Lee, J., Moroso, M., & Mackey, T. K. (2023). Unblocking recognition: A token system for acknowledging academic contribution. Frontiers in Blockchain, 6, 8.
Lelievre, J., Bussières, J.-F., Lebel, D., & Prot-Labarthe, S. (2011). Predictors of publication productivity among hospital pharmacists in France and Quebec. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 75(1), 17.
Levin, S. G., & Stephan, P. E. (1989). Age and research productivity of academic scientists. Research in Higher Education, 30, 531-549.
Lewis, Y. (2021). Research collaborations bring big rewards: The world needs more. Nature, 594(7863), 301-302.
Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The triple helix, quadruple helix,…, and an N-tuple of helices: explanatory models for analyzing the knowledge-based economy? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3, 25-35.
Li, E. Y., Liao, C. H., & Yen, H. R. (2013). Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective. Research Policy, 42(9), 1515-1530.
Li, Y., & Zhang, L. J. (2022). Influence of mentorship and the working environment on English as a foreign language teachers’ research productivity: The mediation role of research motivation and self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 906932.
Liao, S., Lavender, C., & Zhai, H. (2024). Factors influencing the research impact in cancer research: a collaboration and knowledge network analysis. Health Research Policy and Systems, 22(1), 96. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01205-8.
Liu, Y., Liu, S., Shao, X., & He, Y. (2022). Policy spillover effect and action mechanism for environmental rights trading on green innovation: evidence from China's carbon emissions trading policy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 153, 111779.
Lopatto, D. (2007). Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 6(4), 297-306.
Macklin, R. (2003). Applying the four principles. Journal of Medical Ethics, 29(5), 275.
Manjarrés-Henríquez, L., Gutiérrez-Gracia, A., Carrión-García, A., & Vega-Jurado, J. (2009). The effects of university–industry relationships and academic research on scientific performance: Synergy or substitution? Research in Higher Education, 50, 795-811.
Martin, B. R. (2016). R&D policy instruments–a critical review of what we do and don’t know. Industry and Innovation, 23(2), 157-176.
Martin, S., Rocque, B., & Emamaullee, J. (2022). Social media in transplantation: An opportunity for outreach, research promotion, and enhancing workforce diversity. Transplantation, 106(11), 2108-2110.
MasterClass. (2021, August 19). How to improve your research skills: 6 research tips. MasterClass. https://www.masterclass.com/articles/how-to-improve-your-research-skills .
McCutchen, D. (1986). Domain knowledge and linguistic knowledge in the development of writing ability. Journal of Memory and Language, 25(4), 431-444.
McFadden, D. W., & Souba, W. W. (2007). The Journal of Surgical Research: Impact Factor 2006. Journal of Surgical Research, 142(1), 1 – 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2007.07.001.
McGill, M. M., & Settle, A. (2012). Identifying effects of institutional resources and support on computing faculty research productivity, tenure, and promotion. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 167-198.
Melin, G., & Persson, O. (1996). Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36(3), 363-377.
Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 159(3810), 56-63.
Middlehurst, R., Goreham, H., & Woodfield, S. (2009). Why research leadership in higher education? Exploring contributions from the UK's leadership foundation for higher education. Leadership, 5(3), 311-329.
Moed, H. F. (2010). Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 265-277.
Molloy, J. C. (2011). The open knowledge foundation: open data means better science. PLoS Biology, 9(12), e1001195.
Mori, H., & Nakayama, T. (2013). Academic impact of qualitative studies in healthcare: bibliometric analysis. PLoS ONE, 8(3), e57371.
Mounika, A. (2021). Impact of Reward and Recognition on Employees Performance. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 9(5), 2320-2882.
Nassauer, A., & Legewie, N. M. (2021). Video data analysis: A methodological frame for a novel research trend. Sociological Methods & Research, 50(1), 135-174.
Neufeld, J. (2016). Determining effects of individual research grants on publication output and impact: The case of the Emmy Noether Programme (German Research Foundation). Research Evaluation, 25(1), 50-61.
Niknafs, A., & Berry, D. (2017). The impact of domain knowledge on the effectiveness of requirements engineering activities. Empirical Software Engineering, 22, 80-133.
Nisticò, R. (2018). The effect of PhD funding on postdegree research career and publication productivity. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 80(5), 931-950.
O'Grady, K., & Roos, N. (2016, August 1). Linking academic research with the public and policy-makers. Policy Options Politiques. https://policyoptions.irpp.org/magazines/august-2016/linking-academic-research-with-the-public-and-policy-makers/.
O’Connell, C. (2019). Examining differentiation in academic responses to research impact policy: mediating factors in the context of educational research. Studies in Higher Education, 44(8), 1438 – 1453. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1447556.
O’Flaherty, S., Sanders, M. T., & Whillans, A. (2021, March 29). Research: A little recognition can provide a big morale boost. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2021/03/research-a-little-recognition-can-provide-a-big-morale-boost
Omodei, E., De Domenico, M., & Arenas, A. (2017). Evaluating the impact of interdisciplinary research: A multilayer network approach. Network Science, 5(2), 235-246.
Paglis, L. L., Green, S. G., & Bauer, T. N. (2006). Does adviser mentoring add value? A longitudinal study of mentoring and doctoral student outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 47, 451-476.
Penfield, T., Baker, M. J., Scoble, R., & Wykes, M. C. (2014). Assessment, evaluations, and definitions of research impact: A review. Research Evaluation, 23(1), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvt021.
Persson, T., Roland, G., & Tabellini, G. (2007). Electoral rules and government spending in parliamentary democracies. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 2(2), 155-188.
Peters, M. D., Marnie, C., Colquhoun, H., Garritty, C. M., Hempel, S., Horsley, T., Langlois, E. V., Lillie, E., O’Brien, K. K., & Tunçalp, Ӧ. (2021). Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application. Systematic Reviews, 10, 1-6.
Pfeiffer, M., Fischer, M. R., & Bauer, D. (2016). Publication activities of German junior researchers in academic medicine: which factors impact impact factors? BMC Medical Education, 16(1), 1-10.
Podger, A., Su, T.-T., Wanna, J., Chan, H. S., & Niu, M. (2018). Value for Money: Budget and financial management reform in the People's Republic of China, Taiwan and Australia. ANU Press.
Puuska, H.-M. (2010). Effects of scholar’s gender and professional position on publishing productivity in different publication types. Analysis of a Finnish university. Scientometrics, 82(2), 419-437.
Rafi, M., JianMing, Z., & Ahmad, K. (2019). Evaluating the impact of digital library database resources on the productivity of academic research. Information Discovery and Delivery, 47(1), 42-52.
Raković, M., Gašević, D., Hassan, S. U., Ruipérez Valiente, J. A., Aljohani, N., & Milligan, S. (2023). Learning analytics and assessment: Emerging research trends, promises and future opportunities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54, 10-18.
Ransdell, L. B., Dinger, M. K., Cooke, C., & Beske, S. (2001). Factors related to publication productivity in a sample of female health educators. American Journal of Health Behavior, 25(5), 468-480.
Rawls, M. M. (2018). Assessing research productivity from an institutional effectiveness perspective: How universities influence faculty research productivity [Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Commonwealth University]. Virginia Commonwealth University Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/5471/
Resnik, D. B., & Elliott, K. C. (2013). Taking financial relationships into account when assessing research. Accountability in Research, 20(3), 184-205.
Retrouvey, H., Webster, F., Zhong, T., Gagliardi, A. R., & Baxter, N. N. (2020). Cross-sectional analysis of bibliometrics and altmetrics: comparing the impact of qualitative and quantitative articles in the British Medical Journal. BMJ Open, 10(10).
Robertson, J. (2016). Measuring research impact – does it matter? Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 48(6), 613-614. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2016.1230267
Rogers, J. (2019). The use of social media and its impact for research. BioResources, 14(3), 5022-5024.
Ross-Hellauer, T., Tennant, J. P., Banelytė, V., Gorogh, E., Luzi, D., Kraker, P., Pisacane, L., Ruggieri, R., Sifacaki, E., & Vignoli, M. (2020). Ten simple rules for innovative dissemination of research. PLoS Computational Biology, 16(4), e1007704). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007704
Rugaber, S. (2000). The use of domain knowledge in program understanding. Annals of Software Engineering, 9(1-4), 143-192.
Sadeh, A., Radu, C. F., Feniser, C., & Borşa, A. (2020). Governmental intervention and its impact on growth, economic development, and technology in OECD countries. Sustainability, 13(1), 166.
Salvador, F., Martín-Retortillo, T., Giarratana, M. S., & Íñiguez, S. (2021, October 18). What is applied research and why is it important? Insights, ie University. https://www.ie.edu/insights/videos/what-is-applied-research-and-why-is-it-important/.
Sarabipour, S., Debat, H. J., Emmott, E., Burgess, S. J., Schwessinger, B., & Hensel, Z. (2019). On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective. PLoS Biology, 17(2), e3000151.
Schauz, D. (2014). What is basic research? Insights from historical semantics. Minerva, 52(3), 273-328.
Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ, 314(7079), 497.
Singh, K., Chander, H., & Sharma, R. (2020). Bibliometric Study of Publications in Conference Proceedings of SRFLIS Summit during 2014-2019. International Journal of Digital Content Management, 1(1), 9-26.
Soderberg, C. K., Errington, T. M., & Nosek, B. A. (2020). Credibility of preprints: an interdisciplinary survey of researchers. Royal Society Open Science, 7(10), 201520.
Springer-Heinze, A., Hartwich, F., Henderson, J. S., Horton, D., & Minde, I. (2003). Impact pathway analysis: an approach to strengthening the impact orientation of agricultural research. Agricultural Systems, 78(2), 267-285.
Stack, S. (2004). Gender, children and research productivity. Research in Higher Education, 45, 891-920.
Stock, W. G., Dorsch, I., Reichmann, G., & Schlögl, C. (2023). Labor productivity, labor impact, and co-authorship of research institutions: publications and citations per full-time equivalents. Scientometrics, 128(1), 363-377.
Streefkerk, R. (2019, April 12). Qualitative vs. quantitative research: Differences, examples & methods. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/qualitative-quantitative-research/
Sundari, S., Yusuf, C., Kusuma, A. A., & Muksin (2021). The influence of Penta Helix Model on organizational innovativeness and product innovation performance at creative economy supporting Jember district tourism destination. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Social Science, Humanity, and Public Health (ICOSHIP 2020) (pp. 170-174). Atlantis Press. 10.2991/assehr.k.210101.038.
Tadjoeddin, Z. (2010). Political economy of conflict during Indonesia's democratic transition [Doctoral thesis, University of Western Sydney]. Western Sydney University Research Direct Library.
Tariq, M., Ahmad, T., & ur Rehman, S. (2016). Is English language a barrier in research productivity among information professionals? A descriptive study. Pakistan Journal of Information Management Libraries, 17(2016), 162-173.
Tavits, M. (2004). The size of government in majoritarian and consensus democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 37(3), 340-359.
Thelwall, M., Simrick, S., Viney, I., & Van den Besselaar, P. (2023). What is research funding, how does it influence research, and how is it recorded? Key dimensions of variation. Scientometrics, 128(11), 6085-6106.
Thomas, R. (2023, May 8). Becoming a high-achieving researcher: 10 key qualities you need to succeed. Enago Academy. https://www.enago.com/academy/good-researcher-qualities/
Timans, R., Wouters, P., & Heilbron, J. (2019). Mixed methods research: what it is and what it could be. Theory and Society, 48, 193-216.
Trajtenberg, M. (2001). R&D policy in Israel: an overview and reassessment. In M. P. Feldman, & A. N. Link (Eds.), Innovation Policy in the Knowledge-Based Economy, (pp. 409-454). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1689-7_18
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D., Horsley, T., & Weeks, L. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467-473.
Ugwuona, C. S., & Dike, V. W. (2015). Relationship between library resources and research productivity in five Nigerian health-based research facilities. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 1267.
Vu, T., Magis-Weinberg, L., Jansen, B. R., van Atteveldt, N., Janssen, T. W., Lee, N. C., van der Maas, H. L., Raijmakers, M. E., Sachisthal, M. S., & Meeter, M. (2022). Motivation-achievement cycles in learning: A literature review and research agenda. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 39-71.
Wager, E. (2019). Recognition, reward, and responsibility: why the authorship of scientific papers matters. In M. Shoja, A. Arynchyna, M. Loukas, A. V. D'Antoni, S. M. Buerger, M. Karl, & R. S. Tubbs (Eds.), A guide to the scientific career: virtues, communication, research and academic writing, (pp. 361-368). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118907283.ch39.
Wahid, N., Warraich, N. F., & Tahira, M. (2022). Factors influencing scholarly publication productivity: a systematic review. Information Discovery and Delivery, 50(1), 22-33.
Wang, X. (2015). Natural fibre research - Impact Factor Versus Factual Impact. In The Fiber Society 2015 Fall Meeting and Technical Conference. The Fiber Society, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Wayment, H. A., & Dickson, K. L. (2008). Increasing student participation in undergraduate research benefits students, faculty, and department. Teaching of Psychology, 35(3), 194-197.
Weingart, P., Joubert, M., & Connoway, K. (2021). Public engagement with science—Origins, motives and impact in academic literature and science policy. PLoS ONE, 16(7), e0254201.
Williamson, A. (2019, May 15). How researchers and policy makers can work better together. The Sax Institute. https://www.saxinstitute.org.au/news/researchers-policy-makers-can-work-better-together/.
Xu, J., & Huang, C. (2019). The budget and expenditure of the basic research: A comparison between China and the United States. 2019 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. 10.23919/PICMET.2019.8893972
Yao, M., Wei, Y., & Wang, H. (2023). Promoting research by reducing uncertainty in academic writing: a large-scale diachronic case study on hedging in Science research articles across 25 years. Scientometrics, 128, 4541-4558.
Zhang, S., Wapman, K. H., Larremore, D. B., & Clauset, A. (2022). Labor advantages drive the greater productivity of faculty at elite universities. Science Advances, 8(46), eabq7056.
Zippia. (2023, updated 2024, June 25). What is a researcher and how to become one. Zippia, the Career Expert. https://www.zippia.com/researcher-jobs/