Can Artificial Intelligence-Generated Content (AIGC) Bridge the Gap?

A Review of Technology’s Role in Educational Equity

Authors

  • Wang Shuaihan Department of Science and Technology Studies, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Sarmila Muthukrishnan Department of Science and Technology Studies, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Keywords:

Education, AIGC, Educational Fairness, Information Technology

Abstract

Educational fairness is the common pursuit of human society. It is an important foundation of social fairness. There is an inherent and inevitable connection between education and technology. Currently, the situation of global educational inequality is severe, while technology-driven educational innovation has great potential. The emergence of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Content (AIGC) technology is influencing and will continue to influence the field of education. This influence will promote the development of educational fairness in many ways, such as shaping a fair environment inside and outside education, spreading the concept of fairness and justice, replicating high-quality classroom resources, making up for the shortage of excellent teacher resources, and meeting students' personalized learning needs. However, the role of AIGC technology also has limitations in promoting educational fairness. This study explores the relationship between educational fairness and AIGC from the perspective of educational fairness, aiming to provide guidance for its subsequent application and help achieve the goal of educational fairness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: lessons from international experiences. Nordic journal of studies in educational policy, 6(1), 7-16.

Chiu, T. K. and Chai, C.-s. (2020). Sustainable curriculum planning for artificial intelligence education: A self-determination theory perspective. Sustainability, 12(14), 5568.

Cochran-Smith, M., Ell, F., Grudnoff, L., Haigh, M., Hill, M. and Ludlow, L. (2016). Initial teacher education: What does it take to put equity at the center? Teaching and Teacher Education, 57, 67-78.

Cushion, C. J. and Townsend, R. C. (2019). Technology-enhanced learning in coaching: A review of literature. Educational Review, 71(5), 631-649.

Ding, L. (2024). AIGC Technology in Mobile English Learning: An Empirical Study on Learning Outcomes. Proceedings of the 2024 Asia Pacific Conference on Computing Technologies, Communications and Networking,

Garcja, E. and Weiss, E. (2020). COVID-19 and Student Performance, Equity, and US Education Policy: Lessons from Pre-Pandemic Research to Inform Relief, Recovery, and Rebuilding. Economic Policy Institute.

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A. and Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable operations and computers, 3, 275-285.

Hurst, B., Wallace, R. R. and Nixon, S. B. (2013). The impact of social interaction on student learning. Reading horizons.

Husen, T. (2014). The learning society revisited. Elsevier.

Kay, J. (2012). AI and education: Grand challenges. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 27(5), 66-69. Kingma, D. P. (2013). Auto-encoding variational bayes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114.

Li, J. and Xue, E. (2024). Policy Dialogue on Social Justice in Education: Insights from China. Springer Nature.

Masfuah, S., Fakhriyah, F. and Hakim, M. M. (2021). An evaluation of e-learning implementation during covid-19 pandemic in elementary school. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran, 7(4), 933-945.

Mundial, G. B. and Unicef. (2016). Education 2030: Incheon declaration and framework for action: towards inclusive and equitable quality education and lifelong learning for all. Retrieved from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000243278

Opertti, R., Walker, Z. and Zhang, Y. (2014). Inclusive education: From targeting groups and schools to achieving quality education as the core of EFA. The SAGE handbook of special education, 2, 149-169.

Ouyang, F., Zheng, L. and Jiao, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence in online higher education: A systematic review of empirical research from 2011 to 2020. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 7893-7925.

Pan, X. (2020). Technology acceptance, technological self-efficacy, and attitude toward technology-based self-directed learning: learning motivation as a mediator. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 564294.

Pedro, F., Subosa, M., Rivas, A. and Valverde, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development.

Roblyer, M. D. and Doering, A. H. (2014). Integrating educational technology into teaching. Pearson Harlow.

Sipasulta, N. P., Ramadhan, A. R. and Nurafiah, S. (2022). The role of information systems in maximizing company profit. International Journal Multidisciplinary Science, 1(3), 11-15.

Stufflebeam, D. L. and Coryn, C. L. (2014). Evaluation theory, models, and applications. John Wiley & Sons.

Vulkán, C., Szilágyi, P. and Sprecher, N. (2025). Revolutionizing Network Management: The Journey to AI-native Autonomy (1st ed.). River Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1201/9788770041478

Wang, D., Liu, Y., Jing, X., Liu, Q. and Lu, Q. (2024). Catalyst for future education: An empirical study on the Impact of artificial intelligence generated content on college students’ innovation ability and autonomous learning. Education and Information Technologies, 1-20.

Wang, T., Zhang, Y., Qi, S., Zhao, R., Zhihua, X. and Weng, J. (2023). Security and privacy on generative data in aigc: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys.

Wiese, L. J., Patil, I., Schiff, D. S. and Magana, A. J. (2025). AI ethics education: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 100405.

Ye, J.-H., Hao, Y.-W. and Wu, Y.-F. (2024). Effectiveness and Sustainable Applications of Educational Technology. Sustainability, 16(18), 8209. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188209

Zhang, C., Zhang, C., Zheng, S., Qiao, Y., Li, C., Zhang, M. and Hong, C. S. (2023). A complete survey on generative ai (aigc): Is chatgpt from gpt-4 to gpt-5 all you need?. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.11717.

Zhang, L. (2024). Reform and Innovation of Higher Vocational Information Technology Courses from the Perspective of AIGC. Advances in Vocational and Technical Education, 6(3), 199-205.

Zhang, Z. and Wasie, S. (2023). Educational Technology in the Post-Pandemic Era: Current Progress, Potential, and Challenges. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers.

Zheng, Y., Zhou, D., Zhang, Y., Tian, X., Wang, J. and Zheng, Y. (2023). ChatGPT from the Perspective of Computational Education: Connotation, Theme, Reflection, and Challenge. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 41(7), 91.

Zi-yang, H. (2024). AIGC Related Context: A new communication culture for human. Journal of Literature and Art Studies, 14(10), 921-931.

Zifan, C. and Haiyan, Y. (2023). Evolution of artificial intelligence generated content (AIGC) and its application scenario of library intelligent service. Libraly Journal, 42(384), 34.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31